Many people believe that modern technology has brought people together, but others believe that technology has driven people apart.
Discuss both these viewpoints and give your own opinion.
A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether contemporary technology has brought advantages or disadvantages in social network. Strong arguments exist in support of both sides of this debate, which implies that it is worth examining both points of view preceding my summary.
One salient advantage when people use technology as a daily need is that individuals can easily contact with each other and it is the best way of saving time. In other words, there are ample number of social media that people frequently use, a good example that springs to my mind here is facebook. In addition, the idea that people can also do their work online or apply for a job via the help of web resources should not be neglected, as it adds more weight in support of this argument.
On the other hand, those who suport the point that technology isolated some of humanity from the real world usually maintain the idea that persons who get addicted to surfing the net are eager to lose their mind and become, a little bit rudely, 'robots'. This means, relatives, moreover, will be nothing for Internet overusers. For instance, in my point of view, I have experienced one ridiculuos moment that a family got divorced after these kinds of issues. Furthermore, people who prefer to work at home are considered to get seperated from colleagues, too. These claims prove to show negative aspects of the issue.
All things considered, my subjective view on this contentious debate is that there should be a neutral balance in terms of utilizating technological improvements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... eager to lose their mind and become, a little bit rudely, robots. This means, relatives, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... All things considered, my subjective view on this contentious debate is that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95112781955 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76161278472 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5089657605 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.727272727 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173944641342 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594575934875 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372118878215 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943119288466 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420948515971 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.