Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
The sharp development of technology in the modern life has led to the evolution of social networking sites, especially Facebook. That is used as the most popular place that attracts billions of people. They cannot negate the possitive impacts of social network; however, the opposite sides have been effecting negatively on human life. This problem brings about variety of consiquences for both individuals and society that I will express on the essay below.
First of all, individuals are severely influenced by social networking sites. It is estimated that one fifth of population in Vietnam spends 7 hours or more on social nework. This situation leads to the over dependence of a person with online network. The more time they are on Facebook, the less controlling they can make for their lives. Several duties can be postponed or cancelled due to lacking of time. However, the most concerned side that can change one's life is the judgement. People are obsessed with misleding opinions in social network and follow it blindly. These judgements can leave serious consequences which are also make the wrong decision. Moreover, social networking can make each of inviduals does not believe in others and make them choose to live selfishly. It is a severe situation that happen day by day in our lives.
Secondly, social networking also impacts on society. Bad things spread faster than good ones that make people are more insensitive. Social labor achievement decline and social awareness is also compromised. The next generation who early access with social media will be lacking of concentration or ideal of life. In addition, social neworking will offer opportunities for cybercriminal groups. For example, the blue whale challenge has claimed the lives of thousands of young people since it appeared in 2016. People not only face with information stealing but also have the own lives compromised. All of them are still insurmoutable problems.
In conclusion, it is confirmed that the huge negative impacts of social networking sites have led to several consequences in 4.0 era. These ongoing problems will not be easy to deal with, if without the co-operation of every individual and the society. We only need to raise our awareness to raise human social awareness. After all, the key of possitive change is in human hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun controlling is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... The more time they are on Facebook the less controlling they can make for their liv...
^^^^
Line 2, column 451, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...the most concerned side that can change ones life is the judgement People are obsess...
^^^^
Line 2, column 625, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'made'.
Suggestion: made
...ave serious consequences which are also make the wrong decision Moreover social netw...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, after all, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04221635884 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69355536334 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522427440633 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 379.0 20.2975951904 1867% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1911.0 106.682146367 1791% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 379.0 20.7667163134 1825% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 134.0 7.06120827912 1898% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2631332863 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2631332863 0.084324248473 312% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177560802346 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532668378779 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 191.8 13.0946893788 1465% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -321.67 50.2224549098 -640% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 152.3 11.3001002004 1348% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.43 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 26.39 8.58950901804 307% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 153.6 10.1190380762 1518% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.7795591182 575% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.