Many people complain about stress at work. How can employers reduce stress at work and what can employers do on their own to solve this problem?
The twentieth century witnessed a major breakthrough in the field of science and technology. In today’s era of competition, life is filled with sources of stress and working longer time is one of which and cannot be avoided. This essay outlines both the causes and appropriate ways of dealing with it.
To begin with, as the unemployment rate is climbing, people feel more pressure to survive under intense competition and keeping jobs without working hard is becoming uphill task. It becomes worse especially for recently university graduated youngsters, due to lack of any real life experiences they can be dismissed easily. So people have to put more efforts on work and some even work in unsocial hours. Moreover, technological advances make it possible for people to work long hours even while off duty. To illustrate, people answer phones and check emails after they leave work, and for this reason, their working hours are prolonged. This is particularly the case for employees working in the service sector and has to be on call long hours.
On the other hand, there are several practices for employers to help tackle this problem. One is to provide employees with more staff training to have a good grasp of technology. To enumerate, with more knowledge and improved skills employee can work with higher efficiency and reduce working time. Another approach is to provide some stress management training for employees. This can help in achieving work-life balance, and doing more activities for pleasure. Consequently, employees can cope with pressure from work better.
In the light of these facts one can conclude that, competition and technology can be taken as the causes of long working hours. Employers have responsibility to provide staff training and stress management training as it will benefit both employers and employees to gain optimized working efficiency and productivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-26 | vishal sachdeva | 76 | view |
- Many people think that home cooked food is healthy but many people still prefer eating out Why is this so 73
- The cost of air flights has reduced sharply nowadays Do you think it is a positive or a negative development give your reasons 67
- Technological progress in the past century has its negative effect despite its remarkable contribution To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is suggested that all the young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people? 84
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes haircuts and beauty products to enhance their appearance Some people think that it is a good way to spend money while others think that there is a better way to spend it Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: MAJOR_BREAKTHROUGH[1]
Message: Use simply 'breakthrough'.
Suggestion: breakthrough
The twentieth century witnessed a major breakthrough in the field of science and technology....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and has to be on call long hours. On the other hand, there are several practi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27213114754 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81062980162 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550819672131 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.895692321 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5882352941 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296243861121 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982872929554 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582157722493 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183566395974 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063490300425 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.