Due to globalisations, after numerous foreign movies surges into local film markets in many countries, they unavoidably distract majority audience from the local films. There are several reasons for this matter, and I believe it is necessary for governments promote local films by subsiding the production industries.
There is no doubt that more money is invested, the more attractive features could be seen in films. Firstly, those blockbusters like “Avengers” series movies that received substantially abundant funds from sponsors and American government, involved the far-famed actors and actresses who of course, are the key selling points for worldwide audience. Meanwhile, those costly high technologies which created the exceptionally stunning action scenes and breath-taking pictures shoot at expensive locations, fundamental for these popular films to utilize. All these stunning features produced by big money inevitably pressure poor-budgeted local films.
The domestic film industries desperately welcome government’s support financially in order to produce more attractive movies. On one hand, film workers need money to purchase high-quality equipment, hire excellent directors, editors and movie stars. As a result, all these essential elements offer better chances of popular movies. The recent arising Korean film industries which received tremendous government funds demonstrate this success. Admittedly, the investment on movies can be massive, however, the revenue generated from top selling movies in local and even international markets is undeniably beneficial for national economics in the long run. The high-end films’ by-products like tourism may double or even triple the revenue. For example, after “Lord of the Rings” became the winner of “Oscar”, New Zealand government moved up to one of the most popular touristic countries and resulting economic boom.
In sum, financial power may necessarily secure a great success for film industries. With governments’ seriously financial supports, local films are capable of competing with foreign ones to draw a large audience’s interest back to their own cinemas. At the same time, governments will benefit from the large profits produced by these high-quality films and vice versa.
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Some people think the technology makes life complex so we should make the life simpler without using the technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership So for peace to prevail female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bly pressure poor-budgeted local films. The domestic film industries desperately...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, so, while, for example, no doubt, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9303030303 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02557358206 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648484848485 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3083849249 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340131315263 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11227776344 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797336549484 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216739439128 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062518176242 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bly pressure poor-budgeted local films. The domestic film industries desperately...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, so, while, for example, no doubt, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9303030303 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02557358206 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648484848485 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3083849249 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3125 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340131315263 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11227776344 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797336549484 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216739439128 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062518176242 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.