It is true that foreign films are more popular than local films. There are several reasons why this phenomenon has occurred.
In my opinion we need three important elements to make a good film. These factors include creativity, talent, and budget. Foreign film producers and directors are willing to take the risk when it comes to creating new, whereas local film makers are still creating the same type of content. In foreign film industries especial western, there are many talented actors and actress that play in high quality. Despite many talented young guys and girls, local film directors use repetitive individuals who have only good face.
Third factor is Money, plays main role to each industry. Budgets of local films can not compare with foreign films. They invest a lot of money to create fantastic movies difference from previously products. We do not have this opportunity. In my view, government should give financial support for this field. Based on data, South Korea could make a lot of money from sell entertainments. Governments can raise GDP (one of the economy variable) by investing in this industry and income from sales. They can identify talented people and give them scholarship to study overseas, specially the US being pioneer in this filed.
In conclusion, I believe that financial aid can promote local films that can compete with others even with Hollywood that dominate of this industry.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Whycould this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 61
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1995, 2005, and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime 73
- The graph shows the number of cases of X diseases in Iran between 196 and 1995 56
- he graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, third, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13733905579 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52082267556 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656652360515 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7117147516 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8125 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5625 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418580404995 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119946378843 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104258345501 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241135587939 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528462153557 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.