It is true that foreign films are more popular than domestically produced films. There are several reasons why this phenomenon has occurred.
In my opinion, to make a good film, being three important elements is neccessery. These factors include creativity, talent, and budget. Foreign film producers and directors are willing to take the risk when it comes to creating new, whereas local film makers are still creating the same type of content. Iranian writers and producers have a book like a cookbook and they are just repeating the recipes again and again. A producer’s primary task is choosing good film crews including famous director, professional sound recorder and other individuals. When it comes to creativity local productions are not even close to overseas’. In foreign film industries especial western, there are many talented actors and actress that play in high quality. Despite many talented people of all ages, local film directors use repetitive individuals who have only good face.
Producer should substitute new talented players with old ones who can not play new roles or new characters. For instance, “Amin Hayaee” is one of my favorite actors has played similarly since his famous film that was named “Akhrajiha”. His movement, make up, even his walking has been constant without any changing. Being up date is an inherent challenge for any individual; I think he must be retirement. To accomplish great things, we must not only have talent but also Money that, playing main role to each industry. We can not deny the fact Budgets of local films can not compare with huge budget foreign films. They invest a lot of money to create fantastic movies difference from previously products. We do not have this opportunity. In my view, government should give financial support for this field. Based on data, South Korea could make a lot of money from sell entertainments. Governments can raise GDP (one of the economy variable) by investing in this industry and income from sales. They can identify talented people and give them scholarship to study overseas, specially the US being pioneer in this filed. End of all, I think film maker can use foreign actors and actress. Using them is a revolutionary idea, but it will be expensive.
In conclusion, I believe that financial aid can promote local films that can compete with others even Hollywood that dominate of this industry.
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1995, 2005, and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 73
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why could this be? Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 78
- The graph shows the number of cases of X disease in Someland between the years 1960 and 1995. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 551, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l sound recorder and other individuals. When it comes to creativity local production...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, still, whereas, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1164556962 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73130885643 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0164859389 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.84 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387847931736 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954602156608 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774568438345 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240963112713 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486819070976 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.