Many people put their personal information online (address, telephone number, and so on) for
purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Tremendous progress has been made in recent decades in the field of technology. People now have
the ability to browse the internet and sign in to social media applications as well as conduct banking
activities online. This has become a negative development as companies are given unrestricted
access to personal information and as it also provides opportunities for identity theft.
The major issue caused by the convenience of such technology is the violation of the consumers'
privacy. If an individual desires to create an account to any social media website, they must first
provide the company with their personal details. By giving them such access, the company is able to
use it for their own best interests. Take, for instance, the lawsuit filed against Facebook. An
investigation found them to be unethically using the personal information of their users to market
specific products through pop up adverts.
Another problem that has seen a rise in recent times is hacking and theft. Many people enter their
bank details on to the internet for easier access and the ability to conduct transactions from
anywhere in the world. While this is extremely beneficial, it also leaves individuals vulnerable and
susceptible to theft. Advancements in technology has led to new threats such as hacking, while is
highly likely to occur when banking information is provided on the internet, even with adequate
security measures.
In conclusion, people being capable of signing into accounts on the internet has provided numerous
advantages, but at the same time has provided new areas of concern, as the privacy of the
individuals using such websites are compromised and causes them to be in fear of online theft. Thus,
what should have been a positive development turned into a negative one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Nina Tsarevich | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-16 | Meomeo11 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-22 | yennguyen189 | 78 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage 3
- If some people get a chance to choose between life without work or spending most of the time working then they would choose not to work Do you agree or disagree 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The reading and the lecture are both about forest fires and whether or not they should be deliberately suppressed The author of the reading believes that it is beneficial to stop such fires from occurring The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the 80
- some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools especially at the preschool level Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 77
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30344827586 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88956464347 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7012007798 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279820664535 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081563746022 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054996537808 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708534905148 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390525806519 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30344827586 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88956464347 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7012007798 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.38176352705 434% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279820664535 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081563746022 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054996537808 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708534905148 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390525806519 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.