In a poorly designed society system, gap between rich and poor people can be extremely wide, which arouses in severe problem to society. This essay will predict what problems could this phenomenon induce and suggest viable solutions to solve these problems.
To begin with, the most significant consequency that derives from wide income gap is that poor people will live a substandard life. For example, poor people may be homeless because they do not earn enough wage to pay for rent. In an even worse circumstance, people suffer from starvation because of poverty. Furthermore, these could lead to serious society problem that people may commit crime due to the basic need of food and shelter cannot be fulfilled. For instance, impoverished people may steal food if he is starving and nobody offers help. Therefore, the problems of enormous income gap must be resolved and measures must be taken.
Even though, wide income gap exists in particular countries, developed countries have measures to assure it not happening in society. One crucial machenism is to guarantee a minimal wage. A minimal wage provides a decent living of shelter and food. Take Australia for example, the minimal hourly payment is 18 dollars, which renders enough income for paying rent and purchasing food with a part-time job. Another approach to solve this problem is an egalitarian tax system. Again, take Australia for example, people with an annual income below 37000 dollars will deamed as low income person and exampt of pay tax. However, people earn an annual income of more than 88000 will be deemed as high income person and must be leviey 47% of his income as income tax.
To recapitulate, wide income gap would provoke immense problem to society. Measures must be taken to assure low income people have a decent living.
- The chart below shows a number of men and women in further education in Britain in three period and whether studying part-time or full time. 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 73
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more prons to living in an apartment. Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 73
- Intelligence is the most important component for leadership. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and support it with adequate examples. 61
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat. Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letter -explain the reasons for the noise -apologize -describe what action you will take 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In a poorly designed society system, gap...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e solutions to solve these problems. To begin with, the most significant cons...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resolved and measures must be taken. Even though, wide income gap exists in p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iey 47% of his income as income tax. To recapitulate, wide income gap would p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48722067108 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4884166309 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2941176471 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295361465096 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102103913842 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081904989093 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224577279862 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109333595572 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.