Many people say that tourism can be a double-edged sword, bringing benefits to local people while at the same time damaging the local environment and culture. Do you agree with this? What can be done by governments, tour operators and tourists themselves to maximize the positive effects of tourism and to minimize the downside? Discuss your opinions, giving examples and reasons to support your view.
Tourism literally refers to the activities of tourists who travel away from the home environment for some reasons. Along with the revolution of technology, it is discussed that tourism can either be attributable to the prosperity of indigenous people or pose devastating effects on the local environment. From my perspective, I am in complete accordance with the disputed notion based on some following excuses to be deemed.
To begin with, it is agreeable that tourism plays a contributory role to the economic growth of the host country. In other words, as the tourism industry embraces a variety of areas in one nation, it creates a spectrum of jobs in various areas for the natives to earn incomes. When foreign tourists pay a visit to a country, they are more likely to expend their money to cherish the local cuisine, to lodge in an accommodation or to entertain, which, in turn, will offer many opportunities to generate revenues both nationally or privately. For example, Singapore has witnessed an increase in the national capital of $11 billion annually regarding tourism. It leads to the furtherance of local welfare and helps stabilise its global position in terms of economy. In general, tourism is beneficial to local inhabitants because of its contribution to the levels of employment in the given community.
Conversely, it is tourism that has calamitous consequences to the native environment. To be more specific, tourists are exacerbating the amount of pollution in many places. The transportations required for travellers to commute from one destination to another are currently releasing emissions from their fuels such as greenhouse gases that could contribute to the rise in carbon footprint, thus resulting in the cataclysm of global warming. Furthermore, tourists usually litter their wastes onto the grounds after they traverse through those tourist attractions. Those impulsive actions could spoil the natural beauty that attracts people worldwide. In addition, disposable wastes such as plastics would impede the biological cycle as the animals swallow those plastic residues that will bring about the detrimental influence on digestion and drive them to death. When it comes to culture, tourism is believed to extend the process of acculturation. While local people please tourists, they adapt tourists’ needs, attitudes and values and ultimately start to emulate them. By following the lifestyles of travellers, youngsters attach themselves to the paradigm shift in faiths, material goods, postures and gestures, which could ruin the local culture. Moreover, tourism brings about cultural commodification, resulting in the transformation of religious value - from sacred to sacrilegious and from real to unauthentic. Probably one of the best precedents is found in a case of a criminal who exemplifies commodification as a ritual that is sold for money in an exhibition by altering or even destroying original assets to outsiders. Therefore, tourism is without doubt pernicious to indigenous environment.
All things taken into consideration, prompt measures must be taken to resolve those issues. It is advisable that federal members incorporate awareness-raising campaigns so as to better control the aforementioned states. Furthermore, tour operators should encourage travellers to partake in activities that are conducive to the environment such as riding elephants or temple visiting to reduce environmental and cultural problems as well as broaden their knowledge about the world. The tourists themselves are advised to use public transportation or walk to dwindle carbon footprint and exercise.
To reiterate, it is indisputable that tourism benefits local employment while concomitantly exerting deleterious influence on the environment and native culture. It is imperative that the local authorities resort to some wise measures to deal with such problems.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-02-22 | phanhoaithanhphong | 89 | view |
- Self introduction
- Many people say that tourism can be a double edged sword bringing benefits to local people while at the same time damaging the local environment and culture Do you agree with this What can be done by governments tour operators and tourists themselves to m 89
- Benefits of travelling 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...incorporate awareness-raising campaigns so as to better control the aforementioned state...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, as to, for example, in addition, in general, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 101.0 41.998997996 240% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3309.0 1615.20841683 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 594.0 315.596192385 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57070707071 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93681225224 4.20363070211 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20654298952 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 334.0 176.041082164 190% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1054.8 506.74238477 208% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.943574218 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244178963276 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580527343268 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482249253327 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13518723542 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419949169447 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 211.0 78.4519038076 269% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.