Many people think good planning is a key factor for life success. Others think other factors are more important (hard working, luck, etc.). Discuss both views and give your opinion
Whether or not the ability to plan things well is the key element that leads to one's success is still a controversial issue. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
On the one hand, supporters believe good planning skills can help people manage their time. Time is a limited resource, thus knowing what to do and what needs to be done at what time can enhance the quality of the task. Moreover, planning things helps individuals gain the ability to forecast some possible events that might occur during their tasks in the future. By predicting these events ahead, people can come up with new ways to deal with them. For example, when Elon Musk, CEo of a rocket company, was planning the launch of his company's rocket, he found out that a storm would occur on the day that launch would suppose to be executed. For that, Elon cancelled the event thus saving the company most value fortune.
On the other hand, people assert that planning is not the key ability that leads to success for there are further elements needed to be concerned, for example, hard work and luck. Hard work is as crucial as good planning on the way leading to success. Knowing what to do in the future would be pointless if individuals are not going to stand up and execute it. Additionally, it is undeniable that luck is also an important element. As it has been mentioned, events can be predicted through planning, however, not all events can be. Some events, such as natural disasters or car accidents, can come out of nowhere and destroy people's career and success.
Although good planning is an important skill to have, I believe there are still more factors that need to be concerned in order to make way for success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | Mike-Huang | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 67 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | vuhieuquy123 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | vuhieuquy | 71 | view |
- The bar graph shows the number of people employed in different workplaces in one region of Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 67
- Development in technology causes environmental problems Some people believe the solution to these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life while others say that technology can solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 82
- The pie charts below show the different reasons for flight delays in a particular Asian country in 2015 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not the ability to plan things well ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not the ability to plan things well is the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s well is the key element that leads to ones success is still a controversial issue....
^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: SUPPOSE_TO[1]
Message: Probably you should use a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...ould occur on the day that launch would suppose to be executed. For that, Elon cancelle...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66993464052 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37345136696 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2735185503 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210510122357 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750978954527 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800646574131 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142203802649 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601523408443 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.