Many people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that modern communication technology negatively impacts on social relationships. In my perspective, I completely disagree with this statement for the following reason.(ok)
There are good reasons to say that modern communication technology negatively impacts social relationships. First of all, since people usually depend on communication technology, their relationships are likely to lessen. When they spend most of their spare time on social media to entertain or serve other purposes, their conversations can be decreased. Furthermore, modern communication technology may be not suitable for non-verbal communication like body language or facial expressions. As a result, people can not totally express the gestures and messages that they want to convey to others.
However, I strongly support the idea that modern communication technology has many benefits of social relationships. Chief of these, since modern communication technology is convenient that does not limit the distance, it can allow people to connect with other people around the world. For example, the use of communication technology which is easily accessible can help people to save money and time by making a video call instead of making a telephone call or face-to-face meeting. In addition, it can be thought that this technology can allow people to extend their social relationships. Since it has great accessibility, by using social media such as facebook, people can make friends and connect to them to become close.
In conclusion, while some people believe that modern communication technology has an adverse effect on social relationships, I contend that the use of communication technology for social relationships has a positive effect.
- Many people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people think that modern communication technology is having a negative effect on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the diagrams show changes in Happy Valley Shopping center in 1989 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68199233716 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32601036454 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521072796935 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2784578487 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334982515374 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146969054434 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950783105796 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24512044563 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516134618849 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68199233716 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32601036454 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521072796935 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2784578487 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334982515374 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146969054434 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950783105796 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24512044563 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516134618849 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.