Many people think that public celebrations (like national holidays, festivals etc.) are a waste of money and that the government should spend those funds in a better way. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a widely held belief that public holidays is crucial for society and state should pour money for that. But there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that government has to solve the public problems. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in the light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
First and foremost, in the new era, people face to many stress and pressure moods in this life. Therefore, social members need more holidays to ameliorate their lifestyle and stress out. Some people put forward an opinion that festivals, forums, exhibitions, cultural days are able to strengthen people relationship and change a social atmosphere. One good illustration of this is the Navruz holiday in Muslim countries. People gather in the central squares or parks to play horse sports games, taste traditional meals and ask forgiveness each other if they have a quarrel.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that an authority should pour the budget money to social matters such as health, education, economic. People often have this opinion because these benefits are able to rise up nations wellbeing and GDP. A second point is that there are great deals of people who do not have a dwelling. Moreover, the numbers of children suffer from ailments and amount of people cannot find a job. For instance, Kazakhstan organizes EXPO worldwide exhibition festival and spent five billion dollars while 45% of country inhabitants do not have a roof over their head and 20% of people do not have a temporary job.
In conclusion, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I tend to believe that government should solve social problems and harden country’s economy if they have redundant money.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-01-12 | atefeh asadi | 91 | view |
2017-06-17 | Russportkz | 52 | view |
- International sporting events could contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and relevant examples 73
- People nowadays are buying a wider range of household things for example television rice cooker than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 71
- Newspapers and magazines will not be available in the near future because large amounts of information from the internet will replace them Do you agree or disagree Give some examples from your own experience 68
- Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environment conservation. Discuss both views and give your 95
- Some people believe that looking after our health is a duty to the society we live in rather than a personal need. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun stress seems to be countable; consider using: 'many stresses'.
Suggestion: many stresses
...oremost, in the new era, people face to many stress and pressure moods in this life. Theref...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ause these benefits are able to rise up nations wellbeing and GDP. A second point is th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97394136808 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58956630404 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609120521173 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0014022184 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166460236946 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494662763583 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398334473684 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961662954546 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345758012663 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.