In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?

Due to the ever-growing population, rural areas are the only solution to construct houses. However, some people state it is a necessity to preserve the remote areas, which means not to build new houses there. In my view, rural areas should be protected and encourage people to construct multi-storey buildings and shared homes for a growing population.

To begin with, the countryside should be preserved safely because this is the only regions to become farmlands for harvesting to feed the nation, so, forming lands never transformed into constructing new homes or industries. Despite this, stimulate people to build several-story apartments for convenient livings; therefore, new constructing sites could be utilised for agricultural purposes.

Moreover, to preserve forests for natural habitats, remote areas should not be touched, such as building new homes or logging companies. Forests are the main responsible for rains which are a fundamental necessity for human survivals and growing crops vigorously; consequently, if the rural areas were utilised for constructing houses, drought and famine might be seen. As a result, regardless of building homes in remote regions, better encourage people to have shared houses or rented apartments. For example, last year the Indian government intercepted Non-governmental organisations who tried to purchase an area in the countryside for building modern houses because that is the only area for some local Habitat. Therefore, NGOs were permitted to increase vertical buildings.

In conclusion, rural areas must be protected; otherwise, severe consequences of famine and drought might occur, and solutions are many like encourage people to construct multi-storey buildings and shared homes, despite constructing them in remote regions.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74436090226 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07911949724 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56015037594 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.177011618 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.909090909 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275666925788 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117972980655 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633865650531 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18051896594 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544039064304 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.