In many societies in the world, the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare.
A nation’s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future.
With the well-developed medical science, people nowadays indeed have longer life expectancy. However, on the another side of this change, many nations have been suffering from the cost of the healthcare services. In my opinion, I do agree that a proper increase on the pay for healthcare provision is rational and neccessary in the future.
We are living in a nice era with the greatest medical system, which people are obviously healthier than the past. However, humen will still get older and need more medical treatments. Conuntries like Japan and Korea are meeting the problems of rapid increase of aging population. They spend more money on taking care of these elderly and suffer from healthcare provision. These problems not only bring to these certain countries but also actually to an entire world in the future. We must face them in order to improve a better healthcare system for all of us.
To alleviate this burden, one simple way is to increase the tax from the citizons. But this might cause a problem which those people who cannot pay for a high tax, in this case, governments could set levels on the tax which correspond on the levels of healthcare. Or on the other hand, elderly could have an option of paying for the better healthcare service with a part of their pension. It is a true that we should all bear the difficult situation on this matter, and I think goverments should take the responsibility on taking care of them since these people were the great contributors who worked hard in their productive age for their respectful countries.
To conclude, it is a fact that aging population result in the higher cost of public healthcare. For the problem, I firmly believe that goverments play an important role on provisioning the medical resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | anhthuthcsht@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | view | |
| 2022-04-05 | samandarkumar | 73 | view |
- Recently published figures show that the wildlife population around the world has decreased by around fifty per cent over the last fifty years What can we do to help protect the wildlife round the world 73
- The world today is a safer place than it was a hundred years ago and governments should stop spending large amounts of money on their armed forces 56
- Many people work from home using modern technology today Some people think that only the workers benefit from this and not the employer To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- test In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 89
- In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence, people nowadays indeed have longer life expectancy. However, on the another...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, well, i think, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90397350993 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69254168238 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6166866644 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327636075616 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943260300809 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066757365531 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185992026116 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398676258339 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.