Media personnel should not interfere in private lives of celebrities. Do you agree or disagree.
Journalism and media has flourished as the backbone of the modern era. It plays an imperative role in bringing information and entertainment to our doorsteps. Media personnel are responsible for retrieving and publishing this information and thus they have a grave impact on the lives of celebrities in both positive and negative ways.
On one hand, media plays a vital role in providing recognition and fame to the celebrities for their work. They help to form a bond of affection and respect between the common people and the celebs thus bringing them closer to one another. They not only connect us with them but also aid in enhancing their personality and portraying their dedication towards work via covering various promotional events. They also bring into limelight the various charity events and good deeds these famous people indulge into thus escalating their fan following.
While on the other hand, these media people have an inevitably unhealthy and negative impact on the lives of celebrities. Their constant effort to collect images and latest updates can be nerve-wracking for some individuals. They adopt various offensive techniques to do so. To name a few, following the cars, overtly interfering in their personal space, threatening them for information and using cyber technology to make contact etc. Furthermore, they are inhumane to the effect of negative publicity and fake news on mental health of celebs and their families. This clearly exemplifies the injudicious and nefarious aspects of media.
After viewing both the aspects, I agree with the opinion that although media has its beneficial role in building a star’s career but its immense interference is unacceptable and therefore it should implement certain limitations and have respectable boundaries for professional and personal space of the celebrity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ia covering various promotional events. They also bring into limelight the various c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is unacceptable and therefore it should implement certain limitations and have r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38408304498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94252360763 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0979154868 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14232188603 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466085510107 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526321393877 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912171556599 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432942104472 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.