Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s globalised scenario advancement in medical technology is the most ubiquitous issue which has raged a worldwide debate. Although this notion that because of advancement in technology life span has increased is contradicted by many, I strongly agreed with this assertion. The following essay will elaborate my perspective.
To justify my viewpoint, it can be said irrefutably that advancement in medical technology can be provide healthy and independent life. In other words, an advanced diagnostic technique such as X-rays has helped the people to identify the chronic disease such as tuberculosis and cancer. Consequently, people can find their health problem and live longer. Therefore, research about disease is beneficial for the society.
Moreover, apart from this another crucial reason is development in prosthetics has enabled the people to be self-sufficient and self- reliable. Hence, medical science help people to live longer and better life.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that because of advancement in medicines and surgery people can be treated painlessly. To illustrate, if someone wants to do eye operation, then can choose laser operation which is less painful and time saving as compared to old method of eye operation. Therefore, there is no need to go through long operation process and after laser operation patient can go home straight way.
From the above argument, it can be deduced that despite the fact that there are a number of people against the issue, but the fact cannot be denied that advancement in medical has an edge over the society. Therefore, people should be vigilant enough to have balanced, logical and rational approach towards the issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, apart from, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44074074074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93932468939 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3954878685 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120531179607 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418783367267 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277542988947 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657418810052 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173987774993 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.