Men and women employed in full-time jobs should share the
responsibilities of household chores. Do you agree or disagree?
Share relevant personal experiences
With women demonstrating their ability to perform just as well as men on the global
professional stage, it is no wonder that more and more men are taking on the
responsibilities of domestic life. It is argued that all household chores should be
distributed evenly between dual income couples. The virtues of this arrangement
will be shown by looking at the positive effects it has on both children and the
relationship quality the married couple experiences.
For one, parents who share housework provide a good example to their children of
the importance of empathy. For instance, while working in Dubai, I taught English to
children of several dual income families. These children were very proactive when it
came to helping their parents with household duties. Looking back, I feel these
children acted in this selfless manner in response to the living models their parents
provided. As this example shows, parents who equally shoulder the burden of
household duties pass on worthy character traits to their children.
In addition to this, the relationship quality married couples experience can benefit
from their sharing in the challenges of day-to-day life. For example, although my
own mother never worked, she was always very gracious of my father when he
would take the time to help her with duties around the house. This sharing in
hardship helped to strengthen my parents’ union and acts as yet another benefit to
the equal divvying of household duties between married couples.
After looking at how equal burden can benefit a married couple’s children and
relationship, it is clear that this is an opinion that should be supported.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, then, well, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28624535316 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76321480561 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1735743878 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101768497838 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398699711378 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313093822324 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0304101656701 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336292028764 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.