In the modern era, A valuable discussion going on the society, where some people demand to stop killing wild animals for testing drugs others have the opposite view. In this essay, I would shed light on both sides and justify my view.
On the one hand, Individuals in the sides of animal right believed that It,s totally unfair because all the species have the right to live on the earth. For example, Most of the medicines test on the mouses and monkeys and in some religions in India these animals have huge respect. Although, People give respect to some species as a god. Moreover, Animals also have felling likewise pain or fear. So, Using wildlife for providing benefits to human life's totally unjustified. The recent studies show that each year around thousand of rats has been used for medicines purpose know these species is in the danger of losing.
On the other hand, It is an irrefutable fact that medicines test on animals have huge benefits on human life because It saves citizens from many unwanted side effects. For Instance, Covid-19 vaccine directly tested on humans which kill some people all around the globe. So, scientists have no better opposition then animal to test new drugs. Furthermore, Animals body have the ability to absorb effects of new medicine as compared to human beings because the university of Toronto did great research and found that monkeys have some type to unique power to gain the high doses of the new chemical in their body. Which helps doctor or researcher to create new drugs.
To conclude, I would like to state that there are both views of an above-said question. However, If I have to choose one then I am in the favour of benefits to humanity from animals experiments because this the best way to test new drugs yet.
In the modern era, A valuable discussion going on the society, where some people demand to stop killing wild animals for testing drugs others have the opposite view. In this essay, I would shed light on both sides and justify my view.
On the one hand, Individuals in the sides of animal right believed that It,s totally unfair because all the species have the right to live on the earth. For example, Most of the medicines test on the mouses and monkeys and in some religions in India these animals have huge respect. Although, People give respect to some species as a god. Moreover, Animals also have felling likewise pain or fear. So, Using wildlife for providing benefits to human life's totally unjustified. The recent studies show that each year around thousand of rats has been used for medicines purpose know these species is in the danger of losing.
On the other hand, It is an irrefutable fact that medicines test on animals have huge benefits on human life because It saves citizens from many unwanted side effects. For Instance, Covid-19 vaccine directly tested on humans which kill some people all around the globe. So, scientists have no better opposition then animal to test new drugs. Furthermore, Animals body have the ability to absorb effects of new medicine as compared to human beings because the university of Toronto did great research and found that monkeys have some type to unique power to gain the high doses of the new chemical in their body. Which helps doctor or researcher to create new drugs.
To conclude, I would like to state that there are both views of an above-said question. However, If I have to choose one then I am in the favour of benefits to humanity from animals experiments because this the best way to test new drugs yet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-12 | xuanmai2501 | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph illustrates the figures for science qualifications of Singapore and Malaysia Generally the number of Master s degrees and Bachelor s degrees are less than others and citizens of Singapore have higher education than people of Malaysia With Master 67
- Money always generates mixed feelings in the general public In some opinion they claim that happiness majorly comes from money Nevertheless it is believed that money does not have any relevance to happiness In this essay I would shed light on both sides a 84
- With the development of science technology and business in this day and age it has become a core factor that makes people focus on it Therefore art has faded and is less attractive than before In this essay I will clarify reasons for it and give possible 73
- The graph illustrates the figures for science qualifications of Singapore and Malaysia Generally the number of Master s degrees and Bachelor s degrees are less than others and citizens of Singapore have higher education than people of Malaysia With Master 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...e sides of animal right believed that It,s totally unfair because all the species ...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the globe. So, scientists have no better opposition then animal to test new drugs...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77272727273 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33283231174 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7537300383 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437120436177 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145502890801 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166817669196 0.0667982634062 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33994411084 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305768452552 0.056905535591 537% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.