Nowadays, more people prefer rather online communication than personal meetings. It seems that this tendency has only drawbacks for people’s social life. However, it might have also some benefits. Both sides of the problem will be discussed.
On the one hand, online communication allows people to be in touch with their remote friends who live in other cities or even countries. Indeed, today people have the opportunity not only send e-mail messages but also have video conferences for free via special programs or social networks. Another key point that online form of communication does not need of precise time for answering or meetings. In this case, if one does not have enough time for communication, a person will be able to send a message at the appropriate time.
On the other hand, non-personal communication might be the reason of diminishing one’s borders. In particular, people do not gather, so they do not discover new places for entertainments or location within their area. In addition, owning digital correspondence as the only form of communication has a risk to lose or deteriorate some skills for face-to-face meetings such as verbal ability, a body language etc. As a consequence, it might affect their professional career, for instance, if they have to have a public presentation.
In conclusion, the modern technology is becoming to have more implication that it was in the past; therefore, forms of communication are changed as well. The dwelling of personal meetings might cause some problems such as losing essential skills for this or staying in one’s comfort zone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...have to have a public presentation. In conclusion, the modern technology is be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26254826255 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0911140004 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0171691279 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265379845969 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890944082736 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416570725756 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159421109646 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457817165351 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.