Modern trends in early education focus on an array of practical school projects rather than developing traditional skills through maths, science and similar subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is necessary for schools to put more attention in practical projects than enhancing long-established skills through compulsory subjects. This essay will analyze the reasons why crucial in delivering practical subjects will be a right selection.
First and foremost, the activity of projects allows pupils to coordinate their studies as a part of group work, hopefully making them less teacher-led and more about autonomous learning. This in itself teaches study skills such as independent research and synthesizing sources. Secondly, the practical projects have been developed by pedagogical teachers and designed to be suitable with the abilities of pupils as well as ensure some continuous assessment. As a result, students not only improve their academic achievement but also enhance their potential for progression. Last but not least, through practical projects, learners are likely to gain self-confidence among students, arranging group discussions to provide their opinions to get rid of the stage fear. To illustrate, a student who usually works in a team tends to be more interactive and confident in commuting or expressing themselves than a student just learning academic knowledge.
Nobody can deny the essentials of conventional ways of learning because this teaches students some important skills such as logical thinking. However, it is the role of pupils to apply book knowledge in some practice projects. Consequently, they can understand the practicality of the information and avoid the situation that will not be able to relate it to real life.
To conclude, there is a need to balance all kinds of studying. The combination between the academic through traditional skills and the real lessons in practical projects contribute to the high quality in learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | Thanhmai810 | 83 | view |
- Modern trends in early education focus on an array of practical school projects rather than developing traditional skills through maths science and similar subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54379562044 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09137014009 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613138686131 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5102076405 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145921399041 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508215709562 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521310202244 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100041828056 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439703309546 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.