In the modern world, people no longer need to use food or products from animals, such as medicine and clothing. Do you agree or disagree with that statement?
The issue of using animals to produce consumables such as food, clothing, and medicine has been a topic of heated debate for years. It is believed that killing them to manufacture these kinds of goods is unnecessary. In my view, I totally agree with this idea.
The excessive consumption of meat will pose a health risk to eaters. Eating a lot of saturated fat contained in some meats raises cholesterol levels in the blood, therefore, it will lead to chronic diseases such as stroke or heart attacks, and premature death. Moreover, many studies have shown that a plant-based diet not only provides sufficient nutrition for our body to function but it also helps us reduce our carbon footprint as cattle farming is the main source of methane which is the major factor causing global warming. My grandmother is a good case in point. She has been a vegetarian for over 50 years for environmental purposes, and she is still in good health at the age of 80.
Furthermore, utilizing animals for fashion and medical experiments should be prohibited due to humanitarian reasons. Fauna, such as tigers or crocodiles, have been killed for fur and leather in the fashion industry. In addition, it is unethical to sentence them in laboratory cages, and intentionally cause them pain and fear. Notably, most novel drugs that have first passed animal testing usually fail in humans. There are now similar products made from plants and artificial materials that can fulfill our needs. Hence, these creatures do not have to suffer for our needs anymore.
In conclusion, for the reasons above, the suffering of animals just to satisfy our lifestyle is no longer essential because people can replace them with artificial items and vegetarian foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-28 | chichinn | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | chichinn | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | talgatibraevich | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | nguyenphthao99 | 79 | view |
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
- The maps detail the changes to the layout of a public library between 20 years ago and present day 84
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01384083045 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73130299379 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3909832288 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149974526747 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444640850369 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519637733933 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101517879811 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587719106197 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01384083045 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73130299379 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3909832288 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149974526747 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444640850369 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519637733933 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101517879811 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587719106197 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.