More and more people are becoming seriously overweight, some people suggest that solution is to increase the price of fattened food.
Do you agree or disagree.
On of the most discussed issues nowadays is that an increasing number of people have excess weight and suffer from obesity, it is thought by some that in order to tackle this problem the price for food which contains high amount of fat should be increased. In my opinion, while not all people can afford to buy expensive food, people should be informed about dire consequences of fattened food.
Firstly, it must be admitted that not all people will be able to afford to buy a food for high price. Nowadays, the most fattened food is Fast food and people like to eat it as it has reasonable price and it is delicious food, in addition, it can be served for short time. The reason to this is that people have hectic pace of life, the have to work for late evenings and to travel for long distances. As a result they do not have time to cook food at home, also they cannot eat at the restaurants as it is expensive and as a result they eat fast food. Consequently, if the price for fast food would be increased people will eat it less.
Another possible solution to tackle the problem of consuming fattened food is to inform people about all harmful consequences of eating fattened food. Food companies which produce fattened food should inform people that their food is harmful for health and it leads to different disease. For instance, fast food companies do not inform people that their food do not contain any essential vitamins and proteins in their food, in addition, the hide information about the fact that they add different chemicals in order to make their food delicious. If people would be informed about all above-mentioned issues, they will consume fattened food less.
In conclusion, while some people will avoid to buy a food for high price, I believe that there is another way to prevent consumption of fattened food is to reveal all negative sides of consuming fattened food.
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages to this.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 56
- Many people think hosting as international sporting event is beneficial to a country, while others disagree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- The carts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 84
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a lurge financial company. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: One
On of the most discussed issues nowadays i...
^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...ll people will be able to afford to buy a food for high price. Nowadays, the most fatt...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid buying'.
Suggestion: avoid buying
... In conclusion, while some people will avoid to buy a food for high price, I believe that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 52, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...on, while some people will avoid to buy a food for high price, I believe that there is...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66567164179 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48037968048 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426865671642 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1369507076 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279911173354 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147588209814 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511524616812 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209243595992 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115615963479 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.