More and more people are expected to be living in urban centers in the future. What problems will this cause? Should the government start encouraging people to settle outside the city?
Our world is rapidly becoming urbanized with large number of people settling in big cities every year. While it’s beneficial for the people now, in the long term it may lead to disastrous outcomes. In this essay I will outline the problems that it may lead to and also explain why the government should start encouraging citizens to begin settling outside the cities to counter this problem.
It doesn’t take much to realize that constant influx of people into the cities may end up causing congestion and increase in rents. The congestion can lead to more traffic jams and unsanitary living conditions. Indeed some cities, like Honk Kong and Mumbai, are already facing these troubles because it’s nearly impossible to keep upgrading infrastructure at such fast pace to keep up with the migration. The second problem it can lead to is higher rents as only limited number of living space is available in the cities. As a result, people either resort to house-sharing or choose to live with their parents which has become increasingly common in recent times. Recent surveys have shown Sydney and Tokyo to be the most expensive cities in the world and one of the reasons for this is the high rate of migration. Therefore, it’s important to curtail rapid migration in order to save ourselves from these problems.
Even though the situation may seem hopeless at times, there are some measures that the government can take to curb this problem. I believe the first thing that needs to be done is to create attractive job opportunities in the peripheries, so that people stop considering moving to cities. This has been tested with good success in states like Pakistan where salaries of doctors and lawyers are almost twice in the remote villages as compared to urban centers. The second step that the government should take in order to encourage people to live outside the cities is to improve the transport facilities. When people have fast and comfortable travel options, it makes it easier to live in suburbs. Good transport also means easier access to basic facilities such as hospitals and schools, so people in peripheries will really have no benefit to move to center of the cites anymore.
In conclusion, although moving to a big city seem an attractive option in the short term, in the long term it can have many downside such as traffic jams and higher rents. Hence I believe the government should convince people to settle outside the cities by offering better salaries and good transport.
- The charts below show changes in international student numbers 73
- w 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graphs below show the number of enrolments into three higher education faculties in the UK 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
... jams and unsanitary living conditions. Indeed some cities, like Honk Kong and Mumbai,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun downside seems to be countable; consider using: 'many downsides'.
Suggestion: many downsides
...hort term, in the long term it can have many downside such as traffic jams and higher rents. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... such as traffic jams and higher rents. Hence I believe the government should convinc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, may, really, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94326241135 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56388183104 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7816824219 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.166666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371727484731 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104404610489 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842946586443 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219310850181 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073982813061 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.