More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part the natural movement of workers around the world.
Discuss and give your opinion?
It is widely argued whether high-educated experts in certain sectors are stolen /or attracted to/ by affluent countries to fill their professional gaps, or it is a natural process due to transforming or globalizing labour market. From my own perspective, I will discuss why the developed countries encourage immigration of high-intellect individuals and, as well as if this phenomenon is taking placeen naturally.
In terms of brain-drain, the majority of the power nations provide/offer various financial incentives ranging from financial rewards, bonus salary, convenience to favourable living conditions and more on. As a consequence, potential candidates from developing countries are attracted/attributed to aforementioned decent offers in order to have /to seek for/ higher quality of living standard. For instance, the hybrid engine of vehicles was introduced by Toyota Motors, was originallyactually invented by a Russian engineer who emigrated to Japan due to prospectiveminent career progression and high salary/earning. NeverthelessHowever, perks/fringe benefits at work of job prospects and convenient living condition areis not only the major reasons to immigrate rich countries, but also seeking for opportunities to fulfill their life-long dreams.
Conversely, some intellectual migrants make a decisions to move to leading countries not mainly because of financial advantages and convenience, but instead they tend to look for a high-tech laboratory equipments/facilities in order to experiment innovationive endeavour. To cite my friend as an example, he has been employed by a multinational company after the graduationed from MIT as an application developer in 2015. His choice of career started out there, due to the fact that this giant/high-profile company allocates larger funding facilitates enough budget onand cutting-edge laboratory to developcreating softwarecomputer programs, comparing to analogue Mongolian institutions and companies /not clear!!!/.
In conclusion, it is obvious/evident that although it takes enormous amount of time and energy to obtain the priceless knowledge for the scholars, they cannot exposure their intelligence capacity in their home countries. Therefore that majority of the scholars tend to choose developed nations to accomplish their intended innovations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-11 | batbayar | 89 | view |
| 2017-02-13 | mabick_1527 | 97 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a decision' or simply 'decisions'?
Suggestion: a decision; decisions
...ersely, some intellectual migrants make a decisions to move to leading countries not mainly...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mployed by a multinational company after the graduationed from MIT as an applicat...
^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...gence capacity in their home countries. Therefore that majority of the scholars tend to c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07902735562 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.83297257411 2.80592935109 137% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683890577508 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5524339552 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.818181818 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9090909091 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101075762514 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361809254343 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319550889345 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549594933544 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373402292198 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 50.2224549098 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.58 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.65 8.58950901804 136% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.