Today, an ongoing number of young people from rich countries enter governmental and nongovernmental organizations to offer wide ranging services to impoverished nations. The reasons regarding this trend will be discussed before considering the benefits both to the recipients and to the volunteers from the affluent country.
Several reasons explain why the youth from prosperous society join volunteer work in underprivileged countries. The first and foremost factor is that it gives them a better chance to work at their resume by putting their acquired knowledge into practice and to develop skills in different areas. Those with such experience have a better chance in job market than those who lack this knowledge. In other words, having great score isn’t the sole criterion for employment, but practical skill is also needed for the success of individuals. Another reason is that they want to nurture the feeling of community and sharing through variety of humanitarian aids like building houses, offering free medical care, teaching and training. This not only help the locals become more competent citizens but also stimulate their economy.
It seems certain that both young people and the poverty stricken regions reap the benefits. Regarding the young, humanitarian assistance serves as a big tool for political advantage. Volunteers’ assistance improve relations between the two nations which boost political stance of the donor and her country across the globe. For appreciation, the host country or recipient of aid try to return the favor via military collaboration in times of war and so on. For example, America, which is regarded as the biggest giver and donor in the world, has built a system of humanitarian relief to offer its services to many countries stricken by natural disaster, economic problem and poverty. This practice also gives the youth an opportunity to get some hands-on experience which can perfectly be suited to their career prospects. Moreover, it can deepen their self-knowledge and social awareness regarding all the suffering and adversity that these indigent people have gone through. Eventually, it fosters the sense of altruism in other societies as well. In respect to host community, they will enjoy all the amenities which have been provided for them by volunteer work from constructing accommodation or housing, building schools, hospitals and infrastructure and educating children. Therefore, all this humanitarian efforts raise people’s standard of living and economy recovery.
Overall, the need to establish rich credentials and to support all those disadvantaged people to rise to the top are important factors that make young people from well-off nations engage in voluntary activities.
- Today, many people do not realise how important the natural world is.Why is this?How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world? 84
- Some people believe that anyone can create art such as painting poetry music and so on Others think that a person should have special abilities to create art Discuss both views and give your opinion 88
- Companies should encourage employees who work in a high position to leave at the age of 55 in order to give opportunities to the new generation.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizen later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 73
- Today, many people do not realize how important the nature is.Why is this?How can people learn more about the important of the natural world? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51300236407 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96622014688 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609929078014 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8660494686 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.736842105 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238189631494 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624456946514 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455217161943 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139258514223 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171067163124 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.