The ability to create the art has been a subject of many debates. There are people who believe artistic ability is not confined or specific to certain individuals. Others, however, think it is hereditary or innate. In my opinion, every human being is born with a distinct talent but not everyone is able to demonstrate an artistic flair. This essay intends to analyze both sides of the argument before a conclusion is reached.
The genes, that we inherit from our parents, play a decisive role in determining our aptitude. To illustrate, Mozart, who was a great classical composer and musician, showed prodigious ability from his early childhood. He was able to compose from the age of five and perform before the high ranking officials of his society. Another example, Homayon shajarian, the most well-known Persian classical singer whose euphonious voice is supernatural, was born in a music dedicated family. Scientific studies have already proved the individual variations in talent across different domains very much depend on their genetic influence. Besides, variation among individuals make sense when we have scientists in different fields. In other words, If a person is good at something, it doesn't mean he can be good at everything. Even in the classroom, a student may have natural ability in math but he may not show the same talent for art. An artistic ability requires imagination and the skill to draw or compose music.Therefore, people who are born in families having an exceptional talent in a special domain are more likely to be intelligent in that area.
However, everyone is able to produce the art. It is part of human quality but, to create an artistic work, a person needs some much practice and experience. Creativity doesn't grow naturally into a person. It needs how to do a job and deal with a situation successfully. Thus artistic skill requires dedication and a lot of hard work.
In conclusion, the significant role of genetic inheritance in generating high level of artistic ability is irrefutable. Practice can help the person at lower level but it is ineffective at higher level.
- Some people say that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial growth is creating environmental problems and it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Today, many people do not realise how important the natural world is.Why is this?How can people learn more about the importance of the natural world? 84
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizen later Some people think that having these people to give a talk to school students is the best way to tell them about dangers of committing a crime Do you agree or disagree 73
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 78
- : It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 776, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s, If a person is good at something, it doesnt mean he can be good at everything. Even...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1009, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... and the skill to draw or compose music.Therefore, people who are born in families having...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...uch practice and experience. Creativity doesnt grow naturally into a person. It needs ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...and deal with a situation successfully. Thus artistic skill requires dedication and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05142857143 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89905825666 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1741108635 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1904761905 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90476190476 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190143115886 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504538232135 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488603008805 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107253873058 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408441928295 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.