In earlier days, there was no advancement in technology for day-to-day work. However, now people live in progressing era where many changes have taken place, in terms of daily routine and technology too. Also, people use their personal detail to complete their verification process. It has both benefits and adverse. In my point of view, it is a positive development. It is justifiable to ignore its drawbacks.
To commence with, there are many reasons to support my view. Firstly, in the modern era, people do most of the work on the internet such as shopping, banking, navigating, and many more. It is easy to use the internet for daily routine also this can be done in a fraction of time, which is not possible in physical appearance. Moreover, online shopping and banking make our life easier compared to the past. A good illustration of this is, in the past people had to go to the market for their shopping and bank for banking work, while these tasks can be performed online. Besides this, there are other things too, which can be performed like navigating for daily news-papers, assignments, and many more.
In addition to this, it is useful to find a job without roaming everywhere. There are lots of platforms available in which pupils can find jobs in which they might interest and also upload their resumes for further interviewing procedures. As a result, people get jobs at home without any physical activity. Furthermore, in the past there was stress about transferring money to others' accounts, now it is possible in just one click. For example, a platform such as google pay, phone pay, and Baharat pay provides facilities to send money directly into a bank account by giving the appropriate information.
On the other side, this information sometimes works as a stealing purpose. Some people put their personal detail on all the platforms they even do not know about that it is a valid website or not. Subsequently, hackers steal people’s information for bad purposes for shopping, banking, and many more things.
In conclusion, although it has a negative side to this. The positive side is far more away. I strongly agree that it is a positive development to put information is justifiable. It is suggested that people should aware of online platforms and they should check first the website is valid or not.
- The table below given information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 73
- The following bar graph shows the overseas students enrollment in higher education in Australia Write a report describing the information in the graph below 60
- People have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of earth What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists 61
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- government should pay for the course fees for everyone who wants to study at the university to whAT extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heck first the website is valid or not.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91392405063 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77652853748 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9185335623 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.875 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4583333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273449928511 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704804341512 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547167789116 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154513199256 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550921643064 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.