Most career choices demand vocational skills or specialist knowledge. However, despite this, most schools still teach academic subjects such as history or social studies.
People have been studying how to work more effectively since the invention of the first tools. Overwhelming number of specialness requires unique and individual attainments, nevertheless, many students study the same basic science disciplines. This essay will discuss the main benefits and the drawback of learning academic subjects and provide relevant samples.
On the one hand, the disadvantages of this phenomenon are the restriction of mind and the lack of the practical skills. Schools do not possess the opportunities to serve wide thinking for all pupils with this material. For example, the survey, conducted by Moscow School number 345, showed that 57% of children with excellent marks cannot demonstrate equal amount of knowledge in 85% non-school themes. I am convinced that after graduating school leavers often are not certain about the future due to the loss of practice. For instance, my pale Tommy chose the university in the last available month, because he did not imagine what he should to do without any professional tries in the past. Thus, such kind of studying as school does not develop learners’ breath of thinking and does not orientate them in professional term with useful savvy.
On the other hand, the main advantages are considered to be the supply of versatile options, and less expensive schools compared with non-academic ones. Children frequently do not know what they will do in future, and various studies deliver welfare start for all directions. As an example, the whole life a friend of my parents’, Pavel, wanted to be the dentist, but then easily became translator with lore that he learnt at school. The government owns the majority studying institutions in Russia, they always need investments, and many schools with diverse directions will require more special and costly equipment. For instance, statistics, collected by Russian Higher School of Economics university shows that unique academies with unusual specialty demand 30% more money than others. Hence, schools help with changing the occupation, and such standardized disciplines save the taxpayers’ money.
To conclude, I am sure that schools do not improve the latitude of the mind and usable skills. Nevertheless, they arrange horizontal mobility for all pupils and reduce spending of the state budget.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 66 | view |
- People should read only those books that are about real events real people and established facts Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 89
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 84
- Success is often measured in wealth and material belongings Does wealth measure success What makes a successful person 84
- Unemployment is one of the biggest problems of contemporary society What do you think are the main causes of unemployment What solutions can you suggest 84
- Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects instead of some specific subjects To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...requently do not know what they will do in future, and various studies deliver welfare st...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, then, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39285714286 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85611113029 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618131868132 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4504816696 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.470588235 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132882340091 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426873400327 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250721225242 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755177052967 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305255422721 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.