It is believed by many nations that the infrastructure of a country needs to be improved if one needs to raise the living conditions of society. On the other hand, many think that this can only happen at the cost of loss of culture and social morals. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with the statement for in the dire need to improve we end up causing more harm than good. Nations end facing up with problems like an increase in pollution and crime rate.
In order to establish a better infrastructure, most nations exhaust their natural resources of forest and wildlife thus, leading to a rise in pollution. A recent study was done in 2018 by the environment department in Dehra Dun stated that the developed nations produced 90% of the toxic gasses that leave carbon footprints in the atmosphere. This was the result mainly due to excessive cutting of forests and destroying natural habitats of animals.
Another major factor that needs to take into account is the increase in the crime rate. Improving the living standards would further widen the gap between the rich and the poor, for the rich would buy all they can afford leaving the poor with just a desire to achieve what was already unattainable to them. A survey done by the International Crime Patrol stated that an increase in the crime rate in the late decade is mainly due to changes that were brought in by the economic development of the region.
To summarize, I strongly disagree with the fact that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In my opinion, the drastic economical improvement would only lead to problems like a rise in crime and global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to leave'.
Suggestion: to leave
... the rich would buy all they can afford leaving the poor with just a desire to achieve ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...the region. To summarize, I strongly disagree with the fact that the advantages outweigh the disadvantag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80212014134 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67476461919 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7689641438 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156057521075 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490268070839 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340459817651 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852964932397 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209167084981 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.