Students assessment is a way to check the ability creativity and performance of the student. But the trend of taking formal examinations has been changed. Tests like a viva, research works have replaced to formal examinations. I agree with the statement and will give my views appropriately.
To begin with, many institutions are in favour of formal examination system. They think that it is an ideal way to check the students ability. But they are unaware from the students circumstances before taking the formal examinations. Firstly, students have to focus more on their syllabus of each subjects. It is very difficult to cover all the syllabus in a short-period of time. Some students do not have any other alternate in reading the material. This thing eliminates the students creativity and innovation. Secondly, some students before taking formal examinations become nervous and it badly effects to their performance as well. Speedily and in short term period this situation becomes very hard for the students to perform
There are so many alternatives, which may be used to assess students in an appropriate way. Institutions may include in their syllabus research work, presentation work, IQ level test and project report works. These may be best alternatives for assessing their creativity and proficiency.
In conclusion, according to formal examinations performance there may be some burden on the student which leads to low performance. Other alternatives not only enhance the performance level, but also creativity too .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nk that it is an ideal way to check the students ability. But they are unaware from the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...the material. This thing eliminates the students creativity and innovation. Secondly, so...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 734, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es very hard for the students to perform There are so many alternatives, which ma...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s, which may be used to assess students in an appropriate way. Institutions may include in their syll...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
...est and project report works. These may be best alternatives for assessing their creati...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'examinations'' or 'examination's'?
Suggestion: examinations'; examination's
.... In conclusion, according to formal examinations performance there may be some burden on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rformance level, but also creativity too .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in short, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40663900415 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09839384131 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572614107884 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.697840738 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6470588235 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1764705882 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273928545702 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904327700017 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662604302979 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166793000369 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514722270267 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.