The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many believe that the overarching ojective of science should undeniably the improvement of people’s live. I wholeheartedly concur with this notion, as science has the power to revolutionize society, address pressing issues, and enhance the well-being of individuals on a global scale.
First of all, the primary reason why science should prioritize the betterment of people’s lives is its impact on the healthcare. Scientific research led to remarkable breakthroughs in the field of medicine, resulting in the development of live-saving drugs, innovative treatments. For instance, the development of vaccines against the diseases like COVID-19 has saved countless lives and eradicated or significant reduced the ocurrence of these once-debilitating illness. By allocating resources toward medical research, science can continue ease human suffering and enhancing overall health outcomes. From issulin to eyeglasses, medical science has sought to eliminate health problems and this should continue into the future.
Secondly, science plays an crucial role in addressing societal challenges and improving living conditions. Thanks to scientific research in paricular areas such as agriculture, energy, technology, sustainable solutions to ensure food security, and efficient infrastructure can be developed. For example, advancements in agriculture science have led to increased crop yields, combating hunger, and fresh food avaibility for growing populations. Similarly, scientific innovations in renewable energy have potential in solving the climate change and reducing the dependence on fossil fuels to improve the environmental conditions.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that there are many reasons why science advances but mostly for the benefits of people’s living standard. This is because, through advancements in heathcare and contributions to solving global challenges, science has the capacity to bring positive trasformation to our lives
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spend their weekly income in 1968 and 2018
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...to the future. Secondly, science plays an crucial role in addressing societal cha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13454545455 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27965730925 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0888278239 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243659228895 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883414122312 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627360467748 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157498512768 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573119881167 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.27 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.