Majority of people devote most of their time at work as it plays a vital role on their job satisfaction. Besides, there are plethora of factors that brings job fulfillment while employees can face conundrum ahead of their dream.
First and foremost, one of the main part of job satisfaction is the working environment. This is because many people feel that working as a team and having a industrious colleagues helping the clients a meaningful atmosphere. For instance, in a Samsung corporation, workers are gathered to explain their products to particular customers. Therefore, this lifts their hard work in the work and a great sense of commitment towards their job.
Secondly, job employment have increased significantly over the last decades. To support this, one notable justification is because of high salary the company provides. It goes without saying that many people just work for money. To illustrate this, one of my acquaintance works as a taxi driver. He earns aboury 500 dollars per month by just sending tourists to their particular destination. As a result, huge compensation leads to predilection of perfect occupation.
However, these could only be a dream because in modern society, getting hired in a job is extremely difficult as it requires good intelligence in specific field of a job. Research by Seoul University indicates that 46% of South Koreans are in unemployment state due to more experienced workers. So even if you are skilled, the company would directly choose the one with more background.
In conclusion, even if we spend most of our work for happiness, there are hindrance that prevent as from accomplishing them.
- Some suggest that young people should take a job for a few years between school and university Discuss what the advantages and disadvantages might be for people who do this 89
- Nowadays many people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 86
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge e 83
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... feel that working as a team and having a industrious colleagues helping the clie...
^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r customers. Therefore, this lifts their hard work in the work and a great sense ...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that many people just work for money. To illustrate this, one of my acquaintance ...
^^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hindrances'?
Suggestion: hindrances
...st of our work for happiness, there are hindrance that prevent as from accomplishing them...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18587360595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02511335142 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635687732342 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4618343115 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.1875 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291351858397 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837996407163 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818304161187 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149680900856 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819680818484 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.