Today in journalism, we are in an era that unlike ever before, where everyone is a potential audience for all kinds of news and articles due to the Internet. The situation makes the demand of journalists exceptionally high, causing more and more people enter the industry without professional training and knowledge. This makes us wonder how much we can we trust the journalist and how to identify if one of them is unethical?
In my opinion, it is different from journal to journal. Most journals with high professional standards and reputation such as Forbes and New York Times are still great resources to gain accurate knowledge about ongoing events in the world. Since the journalist job market is more competitive than ever, these companies are able to hire journalists with the highest professional standards in nearly every aspects because they are the dream of all journalists. They still have the ability to produce high quality articles in time and educate the viewers with in-depth analysis, making them trustworthy.
Meanwhile, those journals who target professional audience in a specific area is also reliable as what they provide is not merely news, but also technical analysis towards audience who can easily identify the correctness and thoroughness of the article. The problem relying on these journals is that they might not be suitable for normal people to read as they are hard to comprehend.
However, if one article comes from an unknown or small company, the alarm should be ringed. They are the ones who most likely to come up with a catchy fake news just to bring traffic to their website. Trusting them would be a bad idea since the writers have a huge chance that they care less about their future career instead of making money in the short term, while the company behind the journal probably cannot afford editors for proofreading and improving the articles. Even if they were true, when they heard about the news those big names probably have heard it as well, making them not worthy to check out.
Overall, I think journalist still can be trusted. However, with the rise of the journalism, there sure will be many people who are unethical and unprofessional. If we as the audience care enough and say no to fake news, slowly but sure they will eventually die out of the business.
- The government should spend money on railway rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- The news is a source of knowledge about the world. How much can we trust the journalists? What are the qualities a good journalist should have? 84
- 1. A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reaso 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'catchy fake news'.
Suggestion: catchy fake news
...he ones who most likely to come up with a catchy fake news just to bring traffic to their website....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as for, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9362244898 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62750520071 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563775510204 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1644491821 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.9375 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236246956552 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718244047062 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739724596711 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121560248847 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630163266528 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.