An increase in garbage is one of the major problems that society is facing today. If immediate and serious measures are not taken to tackle this scourge, the consequences would be unimaginable. However, in order to find the right remedies, firstly, the real reasons must be unearthed.
There are several factors responsible for a rapid increase in wastage lately. The most important reason for this problem is the fact that more number of people are preferring to use disposable products. For instance, a majority of people in a society invest in plastics, papers, and other disposable items over durable once. In the same way, a rise in generation of waste is also largely attributed in the lack of recycling , reusable items. Last, though by no means the least, the use of garbage is often blamed on an increase number of factories, industries.
The implications of increasing rubbish are far reaching. The most telling impact of this problem can be majorly be a environmental hazard. It adds, to the unfortunate problem of global warming. I addition, the use of more garbage also lead to adverse effects on human and animal health. And that is not all. The increase in garbage also frequently blamed for contamination of agricultural land and water resources.
But, how can this surged in the generation of waste material be curtailed? Firstly, I firmly believe that proper waste management will go a long way to control the amount of increasing rubbish. For example, burning garbage in public areas must be avoided. In the same stride, it is strongly recommended that we encourage people to use the reusable items. Lat, but far from least, spreading awareness in society would also be highly efficacious in alleviating use of garbage.
Therefore, in the basis of all discussions till now as well as going by my personal experience, one thing i would like to state finally is that, unless concerted and war footed efforts made to address the malady of increasing wastage, the damage done to the environment because of this would be irreversible.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... is the fact that more number of people are preferring to use disposable products. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gely attributed in the lack of recycling , reusable items. Last, though by no mean...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease number of factories, industries. The implications of increasing rubbish a...
^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mpact of this problem can be majorly be a environmental hazard. It adds, to the u...
^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblem of global warming. I addition, the use of more garbage also lead to adverse...
^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ng by my personal experience, one thing i would like to state finally is that, un...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02339181287 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85638116818 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6453108693 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148276485881 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454745062763 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491054929966 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848874027089 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498749407499 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... is the fact that more number of people are preferring to use disposable products. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gely attributed in the lack of recycling , reusable items. Last, though by no mean...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease number of factories, industries. The implications of increasing rubbish a...
^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...mpact of this problem can be majorly be a environmental hazard. It adds, to the u...
^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblem of global warming. I addition, the use of more garbage also lead to adverse...
^^
Line 9, column 107, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ng by my personal experience, one thing i would like to state finally is that, un...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02339181287 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85638116818 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6453108693 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148276485881 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454745062763 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491054929966 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848874027089 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498749407499 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.