Much attention has been drawn to the ethical dilemmas over whether in vivo testing on animals is morally justified or it is otherwise. On the one hand, experimentation on non-human animals is deemed ruthless, let alone inhumane. On the other hand, however, imposing a ban on animal research could carry potential detrimental implications as fas as human's sake is concerned.
With respect to the abolishment of animal testing, the matter in question boils down to animal welfare. Each and every living creatures from primitive bacteria to socially complex chimpanzees are brought to this Earth with equal rights to exist. Notwithstanding this implied contract of equity, humans throughout the course of time repeatedly rid other animals of freedoms either by hunting or domesticating. On top of that, we now breed and keep certain classes of animals, such as rodents, primates or fishes, in laboratory settings and take their life for scientific purposes. This raises the debate whether such deed as dissecting live mammals, for example, is considered animal abuse. Should the academic community persist in exploiting animals, not only are regulations needed to standardize animal caring, but governmental supervision would also be of the essence.
Even though the moral downside is there to see, substantial practical applications are undeniable. Conducting trials of a newly discovered substance on other organisms instead of directly on the human body results in fewer preventable and unnecessary death. Based on the aftermath of the experiment, the prototype of a hypothesized drug can be either withdrawn or modified so that adverse reactions will not occur in humans. For instance, although a pharmaceutical company came up with a chemical agent which was initially safe on papers, the resultant death of a lab rat might lead to immediate suspension of the drug without the need for further investigations on humans. Considering the fact that lab rat cells and tissues are comparable to those of our body, if the drug is harmful to the rat’s body, it might be to ours as well.
In conclusion, performing laboratory testing on animals is neither humane nor vain, but a peculiar mixture of construction and destruction. If it had not been for the death of those animals, innovation would have died out.
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 78
- Online shopping is becoming more popular How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required 89
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of a bad person s nature Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, with respect to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28726287263 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04263035209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628726287263 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2002798498 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156208901315 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049892965886 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409865060519 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919902109693 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457029257766 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.