Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is not uncommon to see experiments conducted on animals as a result of scientific research into the effectiveness and safety of drugs, cosmetics and other chemical products. While enthusiasts claim that this is in the best interest of scientific development, I personally find this approach inexcusable, incredibly brutal and cold-blooded.
Those who are in favor of animal experimentation may argue that animals share many common features with human beings, making it seemingly justified to test some newly developed drugs or to perform certain medical procedures on them, such as organ transplants and vivisection, while by doing so, researchers can find out whether those operations or drugs will work on humans likewise. Also, it is believed that using humans as subjects is completely inhumane and immoral, because what such experiments will do to us is beyond imagination, leaving scientists no alternative but to carry out experiments on animals.
The argument of these animal experimentation proponents, although sounding justified and convincing, cannot withstand close scrutiny when some other factors are taken into consideration, one of which is that some of those tests bring nothing but futile and pointless results, with no practical use to the well-being of individuals and the development of science itself. There is plenty of empirical evidence indicating that some drugs or medical procedures, which work for animals, regrettably fail to achieve the purpose of curing humans, as they are incompatible with our immune system, organ rejection in a transplant surgery serving as a typical example.
Another important reason is that all existences are created equally, which means that animals deserve to be treated fairly instead of being misused in various experiments or simply falling prey to humans. From the perspective of animal right activists, it is rather ironic, outrageous and ridiculous to inflict unnecessary suffering and endless pain on animals for the so-called righteous cause of scientific research, especially those concerning cosmetics and food additives, when it is stipulated by law that human rights be advocated and respected on a worldwide scale.
In summary, although animal testing seems fairly reasonable, we have to make sure that animals are utilized in an appropriate way rather than being exploited ruthlessly. Simultaneously, it is suggested that their suffering should be reduced to a minimum extent or other alternative approaches be employed for scientific advances.
- 7 The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 78
- 5 The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- 9 The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, incredibly brutal and cold-blooded. Those who are in favor of animal experim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...tified and convincing, cannot withstand close scrutiny when some other factors are taken into ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 109, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to make sure that animals are utilized in an appropriate way rather than being exploited ruthlessly....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, may, so, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60416666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1169644953 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611979166667 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8177658563 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 215.2 106.682146367 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.4 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293335912163 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107005892803 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506271356305 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148167791807 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187568898748 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 13.0946893788 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.99 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 11.3001002004 181% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.