Nowadays celebrities make more money than politicians. What are the reasons and is it a negative/ positive development?
There is a recently observed tendency that the income of celebrities exceeds that of politicians by a large margin. From a personal perspective, i believe its driving force could be the rapidly increasing popularity of mass media and this development could have unintended consequences for societies.
It is obvious that the proliferation of social media has been a key factor in promoting the income of famous people. Having gained wide recognition from the public, one could easily make great money from representing a company’s image. As an illustration, a well-known football player could publicly advertise for a sports brand, through which he might enjoy far more wealth than politicians. Furthermore, celebrities also stand a high chance of getting paid generously for their attendance to a TV programme, while politicians could only consider such a public appearance as a way to raise their profiles.
I am also inclined to think that this trend might have implications on societies. The belief that a social public figure could enjoy far more financial benefits than a political one could render political occupations much less appealing. Indeed, the prospect of a person with a naturally intended career as a politician easily dropping it in the hope of becoming a celebrity seems fairly reasonable in the context of a materialistic world. Were this to be a prevailing trend, the political environment would potentially be in a severe lack of competent candidates especially for important positions, which will undoubtedly have an adverse impact on the devising and implementing of policies.
To recapitulate, the surpassing income of celebrities compared to that of politicians, driven by the growing popularity of the media, would put societies’s political structure in a jeopardy. It is highly advisable that governments promote politicians’s welfare to offset the disadvantage of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-15 | fordtottenham | 92 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 84
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays celebrities make more money than politicians What are the reasons and is it a negative positive development 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ge margin. From a personal perspective, i believe its driving force could be the ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47474747475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28074353212 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6303374677 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146205662581 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499656417771 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368511461592 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842667344949 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161164723057 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.