Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern word, wide-range of consumer items have been being developed by human being owing to pivotal requirements of lives, which can be divided into durable and non-durable that can last for long time and short time, respectively. It is an indisputable fact that these products can directly be influential in people’s lives as well as their welfare. Eliminating daily routine needs and necessary goods from one side and developing and prospering the production chain of the mentioned goods as industrial perspective and thriving companies as well from other side are two of primary reasons for this claim. In this essay, after representing upsides and downsides of this phenomena, I will give my opinion.
According to develop and change people lifestyle, particularly in the metropolitan cities, not only are needs of people increasing, but they also are using spectrum of diversity goods. As mentioned earlier, there are two different types of consumer goods consisting of durable, such as refrigerator and washing dishes machine, and non-durable, such as foods and cloths, which one of them should be one of the most vital factors of people’s lives. For instance, refrigerator can keep perishable foods and fruits for a long time to use of them, while clothes and foods are used more consumable and they provide short-term people’s needs. If these had not been provided, people’s lives would have been seriously troubled and made some problems.
On the other side, production of consumer goods should be rational reason to prosper of manufacturing companies, boost production chain and economic prosperity. Although some of these goods can be dangerous and have negative irreversible consequences for human beings and environment.
In the final analysis, existence of essential goods in boosting lifestyle and developing production chain can be rationale for taking place consumer goods in specific position of people’s lives. Unless some of them can be dangerous for people health as well as environment, upsides of them outweigh comparatively these disadvantages.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job of shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison.What do you think are the causes of this?What possible solutions can you suggest? 61
- Some people believe the aim of university education is to help graduates get better jobs. Others believe there are much wider benefits of university education for both individuals and society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment will be meticulously scrutinized. For one, economically burdening consu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly devastating effect of consumerism. More significantly, consumerism is tight...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...impact of ever-rising consumer goods. To recapitulate, following the analysis ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72292993631 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56548681885 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9379553045 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.357142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178779330865 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559211307091 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442094683001 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103593474432 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375482593721 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.