Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, it creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this contemporary world, foreign tourism has gained popularity at a large-scale. However, it is argued that international travel causes cultural conflicts between tourists and local people. I completely agree with this statement that travelling across the globe paves the way to numerous problems and misunderstandings between different countries. In this essay, I will support my opinion with examples of different cultured food and clothing traditions.
Every country has its own taste in food and eating habits. But sometimes, food preferences may hurt the religious sentiments of people. For instance, Indians worship the cow animal, while cow meat known as beef is consuming regularly in most of the other countries. Therefore, when foreigners visit India and express their urge to eat cow meat, it leads to serious controversy. Seen in this light, it is clear that cultural and religious beliefs associated with cuisines may sometimes lead to offensive arguments.
In addition to this, a lack of understanding of foreign culture and traditional attires may also arise serious issues. As we know, there is a huge difference between a dressing style of different countries, especially advanced English countries and underdeveloped countries. Therefore, when sightseers from different nations particularly, liberal western countries visit Asian countries, then they are expected to dress up decently in religious places such as temples. In the absence of such cultural knowledge, disputes may arise and may affect the relationship between different countries. For example, Budha temple located in Thailand is a prime example, where strict dressing code is followed by temple priests and tourists are expected to dress up appropriately.
To conclude, though international tourism is the leading industry worldwide, at the same time, it is agreed that it is a source of confusion among different cultured excursionists due to the food and clothing differences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | bibikulsum | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Kamal1993 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | sanimergill | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Other believes that some information is too Important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 67
- The charts below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past. What are the reasons for this? What measures can be taken to fix this? 89
- With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a completely waste. The money could be better spent on other causes. Discuss. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...oreign tourism has gained popularity at a large-scale. However, it is argued that internation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61409395973 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11760678981 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8893149086 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166446390676 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560645915447 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482949172102 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108762736959 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677950849108 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.