The recent decades have seen a growth in discussion of learning quality of our new generation. One of the phenomenon that are enormously concerned by parents is the rising difficulties for children to get immersed in their studies. In this essay, I will explore the reasons behind this perplexing situation and suggest a remedy for this.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that children are susceptible to distraction derived from technical development in earlier decades. Having been found with the emergence of the Internet, tools of social networking such as Facebook and Instagram - platforms allowing people to share photos and remarks at a few clicks - have dominated the pastime of people, ranging from juvenile to adult. Meanwhile, students who are living in their formative years are highly inquisitive, and their curiosities are thus responsible for straying themselves from backbreaking assignements they are weary of.
Further and more importantly, though, I would contend that both teachers and their parents have an onus on enlightening our teenagers on restraining the obsession. Noteworthy is the fact that the technology connecting the world has a vitally important role to play in terms of academic research on account of the convenience and accessibility; thus prohibiting the use of the Internet and its derivatives tends to further impoverish the circumstance, while the perception of skills in time management are likely to counteract the detriments. Moreover, parent who exemplifies the temperance on screens are exemplary for his children.
By way of conclusion, given the essence of aforementioned technology, children are likely to stray from academic aspect than those in bygone era. Yet I believe that assistance shaping routine correctly for children would be warranted in order to alleviate the drawbacks brought by the societal trend.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate.Which do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 11
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, thus, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48275862069 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13088627464 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9715858631 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.545454545 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104261645573 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411761272015 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284771566169 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621428028522 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209695772607 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.