Nowadays, large shopping malls are becoming more popular than small local shops. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is still controversial whether the improvement of dropping by mega shopping centres, such as department stores more than the smaller size of local stores is beneficial or not. In my view, the disadvantages of it offset its advantages.
On the one hand, there are significant positive aspects of having many bigger shops. Firstly, one of the reasons is the reduction in spending considerable time travelling for shopping. This means that potential consumers are allowed to try on a wide variety of products such as clothes and touch new technological devices with ease in a building without concerns of traffic jams. Another benefit is for global entrepreneurs who would wish to foster their business globally. Since they can trade their goods and services with other countries, they can improve the private economic growth and further, their national economic power.
On the other hand, focusing on establishing the large scale of shopping malls can bring about negative challenges in society. One of the serious issues is that bigger shops aimed at the global market can highly control the local markets. Consequently, it is difficult for the local economy to be invigorated. Furthermore, consumers’ opportunity of selection on commodities would possibly, be limited if there are fewer local shops. In other words, popular mass merchandise is generally, displayed in bigger shopping malls, so there are no purchasing tailor-made products conveniently for purchasers, which could be more precious, creative and distinctive than other goods.
In conclusion, increasing giant shopping centres have a double-edged- sword. However, as far as I am concerned, growing more its industries than local businesses seems to have substantial disadvantages.
- Nowadays large shopping malls are becoming more popular than small local shops Is this a positive or negative development 67
- These days free music and free films are available online Is this a positive or a negative development Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with other countries, they can improve the private economic growth and further,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, in conclusion, such as, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51481481481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07996089619 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2093576123 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.357142857 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239252164512 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674096711241 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623264886549 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133606822902 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721742210823 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.