Nowadays many people with families leave their country to work abroad. What are the benefits and drawbacks of this trend. Give your opinion and include any relevant examples.
In this era of globalization, boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance. Therefore, Majority of people with families aspire to move to other countries where they can work for safe and luminous future. This essay intends to account for benefits and drawbacks of this trend.
There are multifarious benefits of this happening. First and foremost, migrating to affluent countries allows people to make their careers at international level. To be specific, in some countries, the problem of unemployment is a nuisance for young people who are educated; however, unable to get jobs in their home country. This encourages young people to move to other nations where getting handsome jobs after attaining quality education is a way easy. Prodigious academic students can accomplish top-notch jobs in many international companies of world. The advantage of migrating to other nations for optimum career opportunity is thus very clear. What is more, aristocratic and secured lifestyle is the another factor, encouraging people to leave their home countries. To demonstrate, people are supposed to get many privileges such as free of cost education, health treatments, financial support during pandemic or any emergency after achieving permanent residency in some developed countries. In their home nations, they are not provided such amenities. Infact, unlike their home countries, clean and green environment, fabulous infrastructure, and world-class lifestyle of developed nations allure people to make their families settled overseas. Opposite wind is also there.
To commence with, the problem of brain drain is the most obvious negative outcome of this situation. To make it clear, talented people of different fields are in the rat race of going abroad for bright future. In response, their home nations are left with scarcity of talented work force. This will definitely slow down the progress of their respective nations. As a consequence, developed nations are likely to be more advanced in the presence of brilliant people, whereas this situation will drag thriving nations down. It is quite common for Migrants to follow and admire the ways of living prevailing in the nation they migrate. As a result, the respect for their native cultural heritage and family background declines at an alarming rate.
To recapitulate, undeniably, migration to overseas with family brings few shortcomings. I, however, still stand in the favour of migrating abroad as this invites holistic development of family and professional life.
- Some people think that when a person travels into a different culture they should adapt to the local practices and cultures To what extent do you agree 50
- In some countries, old age is valued, while, in others, youth is emphasized. Which view point do you agree with? 85
- Some people believe that the internet will replace traditional books in the future Do you believe this would be a positive or a negative development 92
- It is said that the teacher will be replaced by the computer in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Nowadays, people care about their appearance more than before. Do you agree or disagree? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry clear. What is more, aristocratic and secured lifestyle is the another factor,...
^^
Line 3, column 1183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astructure, and world-class lifestyle of developed nations allure people to make ...
^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced in the presence of brilliant people, whereas this situation will drag thrivin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5306122449 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91893368987 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1990257272 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2608695652 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265500508931 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736512154048 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499918573416 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162916097991 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417630341774 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.