Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the
younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions
In recent years, an increasing number of people are concerned about the phenomenon that fierce competition in the job market between the older people and the elder people has become an increasingly widespread problem. Although there will be some negative consequences of this trend, several measures can be taken to address this potential problems.
There are several issues caused by the increasing competition of job between the older worker and younger worker. One of these is age discrimination; the older suffer disadvantages when seeking the same position as young candidates and even they have similar abilities and qualifications. As a result, a number of them will be unemployment, due to they will not have enough money to cover their basis needs. The second problem is that the older people are under strong pressure when the young people seem to be more creative and adapt to changes at the workplace easier than. This may lead to depression.
There are some effective solutions to address the job competition. Firstly, what business should do is to have a fixed quota of jobs set aside for people under a certain age and over a certain age. As a result, they will be more opportunities to find suitable jobs and earn a living. Another measure would be for individual. The older workers should be willing to update their skill through attending training course and try to adapt to changes in the working environment.
In conclusion, a range of measures can be used to mitigate the problems that possibly arise as the job competition between older people and young people is increasing.
- The chart below give information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 78
- price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugarsand sweets, and carbonated drinks 56
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 56
- In some countries, a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers. Why has this happened? What are some effects? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8184383778 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1274007463 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23150604118 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765111119337 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573284730096 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148194216074 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106111719663 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.