Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is true that the number of youngsters holding important positions in the government is growing in these days. I would argue that this trend could have both negative and positive consequences in equal measure.
On the one hand, this trend has some notable drawbacks. The bottom line is that young leaders usually face difficulties in leading older people who work longer than them. In Eastern countries, for example, young talents are not often recognised their leadership. They are usually thought to have insufficient capabilities to manage all aspects of policy as the economy or international affairs. Moreover, all of them is short of real experience. They may face fewer challenges in their career so that they are likely to easily make vital mistakes, which can affect badly to the public.
On the other hand, all above arguments cannot demonstrate that young people are unable to occupy important positions in the government. Firstly, it is undeniable that their youth is a huge advantage which enables them to be creative and up-to-date. This may result in many breakthrough innovations and styles in managing policies. Secondly, it is apparent that young people have a longer period of working time to contribute to their nation. An illustration can be seen is that the same the qualification or certificate they are more likely to be elected rather than older counterparts because of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the rise in the number of young people working on important positions has advantageous and disadvantageous effects to the society.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 82
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 90
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11895910781 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9039858592 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2260314616 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183380682657 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058629518387 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062495904055 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117437588358 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370268943054 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.