Nowadays, more people move away from their friends and families for work. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, more people move away from their friends and families for work. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, it is observed that more individuals are inclined to migrate to other nations to work. Although I partly acknowledge that this tendency might be riddled with some pitfalls, I would align myself with the perception that this trend would have a vast array of favorable effects on both workers and their own countries.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that this inclination can exert some negative influences. Firstly, employees are likely to suffer from culture shock if they work overseas. This is because they might struggle with adjusting themselves to new customs within a short time, which hinders them from having a happy and satisfactory life. Furthermore, some individuals might feel homesick owing to the fact that they could face some impediments to get accustomed to living without relatives or friends. For instance, numerous Vietnamese people who go to some countries such as Korea or Japan tend to experience the feeling of loneliness. However, employees could relieve homesickness by making calls or chatting with their friends via some social apps, in spite of the geographical distance.
On the other hand, moving to other countries for working would be auspicious in some facets. The first advantage is that workers are able to be employed for high-paid occupations in light of the wider range of job prospects that other nations offer to them. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that thanks to working in some prestigious corporations in Japan like Mitsubishi or Toyota, many Vietnamese inhabitants are sufficient in financial conditions, which allows them to make ends meet and save up money. Moreover, working in other countries serves such a fundamental role in helping workers to approach to new-fangled and advanced technology. For example, when working in the USA, individuals from other impoverished nations are given an opportunity to broaden their horizons with new technological innovations like 3D-printing machines or automatic driving cars. Hence, when returning to their home, they can dedicate knowledge relating to new techniques to spurring the development of their own nations.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that working abroad might give rise to a number of repercussions; nevertheless, I want to affirm that the benefits workers can derive from this trend might offset the drawbacks. In addition, from my perspective, it is desirable for them to make judicious decisions in terms of whether to work in other nations.
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is that Is it a positive or negative trend 89
- the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time 11
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34299516908 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96432615844 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0564859043 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284354183058 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111080197508 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155131992817 0.0667982634062 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256457186831 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.311093906988 0.056905535591 547% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.