Nowadays nations are becoming more interesting and developing better thanks to the mixing of different nationalities and cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Globalization has shrunk the whole world into a global village where boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance. Presently, it is argued that amalgamation of distinct nationalities and cultural exchanges are making countries more enticing and accelerating the rate of progress. Therefore, mixing of cultures deserves a huge appreciation. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are numerous points to endorse the former view. First and foremost, multiculturalism promoted by the development of bonds among nations has made travelling more interesting and fun around world. For example, nowadays, tourists can experience diversity in the food, wearing styles, fun activities and cultural values in the countries where they travel during holidays. They are not expected to lack availability of things of their interests. Apart from it, sharing of rituals and cultural exchanges bridge the gap of thinking and lifestyle of people living in distinct nations around the world.
Needless to say, nations are becoming more interesting to be explored by the people.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, growing single world culture is elevating progress and economy of different nations. For example, nowadays, growing relationships among nations on account of globalization has led to sharing of cultural values, commercial dealings and business of import and export. International companies are establishing their branches in different parts of the world because of growing similarities in the ways of living, wearing, eating and making survival. Besides this, Tourism is spreading its roots in every corner. Similarity in the ways of eating, living and wearing has disappeared the cultural gaps and people are being stimulated to travel around world without language or cultural barriers. Thus, rising tourism, social, cultural and commercial dealings is uplifting development in every country.
To recapitulate, undeniably, exchanges of values, interests and commodities are extremely lucrative for holistic development and making nations more fascinating. Therefore, the trend of mixing up should be continuing to grow for the betterment of the world.
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extend do you agree or disagree w 90
- Being a celebrity – such as a famous film star or sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 78
- Some people think that excessive use of mobile phones and computers badly affects teenagers’ writing and reading skills. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Give your opinion. 97
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 75
- People think that good health is a basic need so it should not be in hands of profit oriented companies Are the advantages of profit oriented companies overweight the disadvantages 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...esting to be explored by the people. Further emphasizing on my point of view, growin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, therefore, thus, apart from, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7078313253 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0589288407 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563253012048 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1353684522 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.277777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247508796998 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766936542147 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656681805144 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161957543957 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420525296152 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.