Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society?
Over the last few years, many universities around the world have witnessed glaring inadequacy of students choosing subjects in science. This trend is heralded as the result of some educational problems and might take a toll on society in the long run.
Regarding the cause of this problem, drawbacks in educational systems of many countries are what to blame. First, by cramping too much unnecessary knowledge of science, high schools and universities are inadvertently fading the enthusiasm students have for science subjects. For example, had my math teacher in high school not intimidated us with daily stiff exams demanding a wide range of knowledge, more classmates of mine would have opted to study more subjects related to science in university. Second, since there is little time allocated for science exploration instead of mere knowledge, students are less motivated to choose these subjects to study. In fact, such curricula can cultivate fruitlessness of studying science in students’ mind, resulting in less and fewer university students taking science courses.
The dwindling popularity of science subjects in university can result in many consequences in terms of the advancement of humankind. First, since fewer students enrolling in science courses means less workforce equipped with fundamental knowledge of this important field. As a result, other sectors such as technology, education or even public health, whose development depends heavily on science will inevitably experience a slowdown. In addition, imbalance of the workforce would also be an unavoidable outcome of this practice. In fact, science-related jobs will appear inevitable to most people, increasing competitiveness amongst other non-related ones.
In conclusion, the ineffectiveness of teaching methods in both high schools and universities largely contributes to the decrease of university students studying science subjects, producing negative effects on developments of societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | star_nana | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | zentirot | 41 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Trần Trang | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | anhtuan1095 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-23 | honza | 73 | view |
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problem 93
- Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. What are the reasons for this problem? What are the effects on the society? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ess amongst other non-related ones. In conclusion, the ineffectiveness of teac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80821917808 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17050792033 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2126006923 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337693226838 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111918319351 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565585190565 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191891643572 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615529696461 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.