Nowadays people live longer after they retire.
How does this affect individuals and society? What can be done about this?
It is argued that the average life expectancy after retirement has increased. Irrespective of the reasons for such a phenomenon, the implication is that this trend has a positive and negative impact on both the retirees and society, so the question is what measures should be taken to handle the downside.
On the one hand, the opportunities the trend offers are obvious. The elderly can provide support to their children by babysitting and by giving young families the opportunity to continue working, hence contributing to the extended family’s well-being. In this case, it seems that the trend is a great advantage for both the individual family’s welfare and the social system.
On the other hand, the threats the tendency poses are also clear. Every rose has its thorn, and longer lives happen to create pressure for Social Security. The main problem is the increasingly high number of persons reaching retirement age compared with the number of active workers. Most of young people complete their education in their early 20s, work for 40 years and retire at the age of 62. According to the statistics, governments invest in their development around 33% of their lives contributing to its income for the remaining 67%. If governments follow the same strategy, then new generation will need to work for 48 years and retire at the age of 68. This will influence how they plan their lives, educations and careers, which will have various social implications.
Further mulling over the downside, we should admit that the increase in the number of the ill and the disabled may have dire consequences on the economy of health care system, causing an increase in the tax burden on the employed ones. To provide this impact, the funding system needs to be reexamined and restructured in general. Aimed at the repartition of the charges, the new system should take into consideration the proportion of retired and employed people, effective investment of the existing funds and the participation of state in attracting additional funding.
To summarize, it appears that the problem is connected not only with the span of life but also with its life of retired people and the government should take measures to minimize the negative impact of each and every.
- Computer games are a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 70
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups However sharing personal information on social media websites does have a risk Do you think that advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The school administration has received additional funding and has decided to use the money to fund a new course that teaches practical skills Which of the following courses do you think the school should create A a class on how to use social media B a cla 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ll have various social implications. Further mulling over the downside, we should ad...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08288770053 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78780598694 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8774464532 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171746892225 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517807325619 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410982273876 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842718065119 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035753331364 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.