nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing ( for example, through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do u think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, advancement in technology is allowing government and private companies to keep the public under surveillance with the hell of security cameras and cellphones. The given topic asserts that does the advantages of recording the moments of ordinary people outweigh its disadvantages. I will examine the given topic in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are numerous benefits of using cameras and cellphones to track the people due to security reasons. The areas where the crime rate is in the massive amount can be controlled using these gadgets, this is the biggest advantage. When they commit any crime, the cameras may provide useful evidence. Moreover, whenever they see a camera, they think twice before burgaling and stealing anything. Similarly, cellphones are also highly beneficial, as in some cases police replies on the call logs of the victim which would help them to trace the location of the criminal or suspect.
Certainly, it has some disadvantages too. In some areas, where people go to spend their time with their kith and kinks, there these gadgets act as an interruption in the relationships. For instance, in big shopping complexes or malls people are under high supervision due to which their privacy is being invaded, despite of wondering at public place they cannot enjoy fully with their belongings.
I pen down by saying that capturing the people is good idea to reduce the crimes, but at some places it has been snatching the privacy of ordinary people. Thus government should use these cameras or cellphones but at limited places only.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-08-15 | Kaurrippan0@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 73
- The two pie charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s 74
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 73
- The chart below show the percentage of fatal accidents by locations in a European country The survey was conducted in 2000 79
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...atching the privacy of ordinary people. Thus government should use these cameras or ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, similarly, so, thus, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15953307393 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72167237045 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7931817295 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19682824336 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651599610131 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577168243721 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106145340208 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407404536129 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.