Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
These days, thanks for the advance in technology, such as the Internet, people have variety of choices to communicate. Therefore, the technology has had a significant influence on society which gives an opportunity to communicate on social networks whenever they want, and all of these are provided for low prices. This essay will prove that this development is more likely to lead to the bright future.
Since its invention, the Internet has replaced traditional means of communication. The first reason for this can be the lack of face-to-face communication between individuals as they have the tendency to be online on a regular basis. For example, in my neighbourhood, people have become less sociable than they accustomed to be. As a result, the friendship among them will not strengthen, if the Internet offers a wide range of opportunities to keep in touch. Another influence can be that some online users have increasingly concerned about the quality of relationship in real and virtual communication of human being. There is an evidence that people might have a great deal of friends on social networks; however, there could be up to ten real ones.
However, despite the fact that its somehow affected the relationships, the Internet has facilitated the way of communication. First of all, now it is possible to call or even send multiple short messages to anybody in the globe. In addition, this allows to contact with relatives from overseas on a daily basis for little amount of charges. For example, desktop and mobile applications, such as Viber, has created an environment for people to send messages any time, and reply for it whenever it is convenient for them. Thus, it seems that this advance will provide even more benefits in the near future.
In conclusion, relationships among people have become more virtual due to the technology, and as a result, there is a less reliance on friends. Nevertheless, it offers inexpensive communication with local and foreign people and will have provided more services to people by the next decade.
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992. 56
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community others fear that it is lowering the q 56
- In some countries owning a home rather that renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think is a positive or negative situation 61
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Other however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'contacting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: contacting
... in the globe. In addition, this allows to contact with relatives from overseas on a daily...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11538461538 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01041136565 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541420118343 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4782980427 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150714979747 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495356453856 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379860180959 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991610947417 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337500908986 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.